Talk:Masa Saito/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi. I am reviewing your article Masa Saito for GA. I have read through it and have a couple of comments.

• There is a dead link that I commented out: http://www.otherarena.com/htm/cgi-bin/biography.cgi?kenpater
• In "Finishing and signature moves", why are some of the entries bolded and some are not?
• I feel there are too many short sections, containing only a few sentences.
• Other than describing his wrestling career in the form of the championships he won etc. there is very little sense of his character as a wrestler, his training, his motivation etc.
• The brief section "Battery", other than saying that he was sent to prison, there is no mention of the impact of such an event on his life or his career.
• There is nothing about his personal life. Normally, I am not a stickler for this, but in the absence of any personal information at all, something is needed in this article to bring the article subject to life.
• The writing style is very dry and nothing stands out about this person for the average reader.

—Mattisse (Talk) 02:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): The prose is grammatically correct, but very dry and uninteresting. b (MoS): No MoS errors noted

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): The article is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No original research

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): The article does not set the subject in sufficient context for the general reader b (focused): It is too focused and does not contain sufficient information on the subject to be interesting

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I am sorry to fail this article. Normally your articles are very good. Perhaps there just is not enough information available on Masa Saito to provide for a GA. You may, of course, resubmit the article at GAN or list it at GAR. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)