Talk:Maryland Route 291/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

No disamb. links or invalid external links.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   "After crossing the Chestertown Branch of the Northern Line of the Maryland and Delaware Railroad," - at grade or bridge?

   "crosses the Centreville Branch of the Northern Line of the Maryland and Delaware Railroad" - at grade or bridge?

   At intersection with MD 298, it is named Cypress Street.

   I changed "crosses" to "intersects" in both sentences with the railroads. I understand MD 291 is marked as both Cypress Street and River Road at that point in Google Maps. I went with the name in the HLR, River Road.  VC  11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Are there any construction projects planned for the route?

   Should the history section say when the grade separation with U.S. 301 was built? (May be different than the roundabouts)

   No construction projects are planned. I supplemented the last sentence of the History by mentioning both the bridge and the roundabouts were built in 1999.  VC  11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

   Thank you for your review, Racepacket.  VC  11:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on another good article. Racepacket (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)