Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by LOVI33 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey MaranoFan, I'll review this. LOVI33 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing this article, LOVI33. Looking forward to it!--NØ 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lead
edit- Remove streaming from Format - source for that is from iTunes which is solely digital download
- Sourced to Tidal now.
- Is the 2014 recording year sourced?
- Are you sure Soul should be included as a genre since it refers to solely to its references?
- One of the critics stated it has a "modernized throwback soul sound".
- Per Template:Infobox song, later releases should be included in the article, not infobox so remove Atlantic records.
- Isn't this Puth's debut single? If so you should add something about that in the opening sentence.
- Target music critics to Music journalism
Background and release
edit- Target lead single to itself
Composition
edit- Target retro to Retro style
- Target verse to Song structure#Verse
Critical reception
edit- Target music critics to Music journalism
Chart performance
editNorth America
edit- Looks good!
Oceania and Europe
edit- Target Scottish Singles Chart to Scottish Singles and Albums Charts
- Target French Singles Chart to Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique
Music video
edit- Looks Good!
Live performances
edit- Looks Good!
Track listing
edit- Looks Good!
Credits and personnel
edit- Target liner notes to itself
Charts
edit- Weekly charts says 2014–15 but wasn't it released in 2015?
Certifications
edit- Looks Good!
Release history
edit- Remove streaming, sources are from iTunes.
References
edit- Make sure all of these are archived.
- Copyvio score needs work at 43.2%. Fix your quoting from ref 3
- Change publisher to BBC for ref 8
- Remove target to Entertainment Weekly on ref 19
- Ref 51 is missing a website or publisher.
- Ref 56: "jeff" → "Jeff"
External links
edit- Looks Good!
Final comments and verdict
edit- On hold for now. This article was really well written. Good job! LOVI33 17:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've either done or responded to all of your comments.--NØ 03:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Great! ✓ Pass. LOVI33 12:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.