Talk:Mario Bros./GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Pass, after several tweaks on my part. I'd strongly recommend putting this through a peer review though. -- Sabre (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   The fair use rationales are rather weak. I'd try bolstering them before taking the article any further

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   You could probably use a better caption on Image:Mario_Bros._Gameplay.gif

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the assessment, though I don't think I'll be taking it any further. I think I've milked as much information from the Internets as I can. The gameplay section is pretty much done, as is the ports and follow-ups section. Development and Reception may grow if I can find some print sources for the reviews, maybe some sales, and look around for interviews ABOUT Mario Bros. (maybe delve into development information about later versions). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)