Talk:Marcus Licinius Scribonianus Camerinus

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Grumblings edit

This article relies on material at the now-gone website Ancient Library, which, from the URL, appears to be the article "Scribonianus Camerinus" from Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Okay, not what I consider the gold chip of sources, but it's good enough to use & I could use that article in DGRB to clean up some of the truly sketchy other links. However, looking at the copy of DGRB at U Mich, the article about "Camerinus, Scribonianus" is about a slave who impersonated a senator during the reign of Nero whose imposture was uncovered & crucified. Not what should be cited to support points in this article. Or maybe the copy of DGRB at that website was rewritten with additional material of unknown quality & all links there are completely unreliable. And, most importantly, is there anything in this article that one can trust? Or should all articles that cite the Ancient Library website simply be deleted & we start over? -- llywrch (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Marcus Licinius Scribonianus Camerinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply