Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 3/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by TheDoctorWho in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Infobox looks good.
  • "also become a co-showrunner" → "also became a co-showrunner"

Cast and characters

edit
  • No problems here.

Episodes

edit
  • "Rick, T.C. and Katsumoto" → "Rick, T.C., and Katsumoto"
  • The sentence "Meanwhile, Higgins expresses concern after a first date with her surgeon that he is 'too perfect,'" needs rewording.
  • "Magnum and T.C." → "Magnum, and T.C."

Crossovers

edit
  • "early 2020 numerous actors" → "early 2020, numerous actors"

Production

edit
  • "who also co-developed the series and is an executive producer for the series" → "who also co-developed and executive-produced for the series".
  • "start date.[31] September 14, was later" → "start date;[31] September 14 was later"
  • "on the set crowd" → "on the set, crowd"
  • A better, secondary source is needed for Kurt Jones joining the series.
  • "Roger E. Mosley who portrayed" → "Roger E. Mosley, who portrayed"
  • "Dennis Chun who" → "Dennis Chun, who"
  • Remove the space in-between the two references after "introduced in the first season".

Marketing and release

edit
  • "Blue Bloods" links to a disambiguation page. Fix the link to Blue Bloods.

Viewing figures

edit
  • This section looks good.
  • Some +7 ratings are already available here.

References

edit
  • Using this tool, or doing it manually, archive all archivable sources (citations from the Futon Critic can be archived using this).

Overview

edit

GAN table

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Notes

edit
  • @TheDoctorWho: I have just finished adding most, if not all my notes. This article is well-written, but has some small issues to address. Please leave comments, and ping me back when you have done so. I hope I can promote this article soon.   Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 14:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just now remembering I forgot to archive references, I'll get to that in the morning. TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Sorry it took me so long, IABot was down this morning, everything has been archived so that should address all of your concerns. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply