Talk:Macrotocinclus

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Identity

edit

Surely this fish is actually Otocinclus macrospilus?

Otocinclus macrospilus http://www.planetcatfish.com/scripts/clog_link.php?q=otocinclus+macrospilus

Otocinclus affinis looks very different. See http://www.planetcatfish.com/scripts/clog_link.php?q=otocinclus+affinis

The fish on the photo is definitely not O. affinis, but pretty much all smaller oto species are sold as "Otocinclus affinis". 213.114.237.26 (talk) 01:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


--Quatermass 13:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

So all of the results at http://images.google.com/images?q=otocinclus%20affinis are misidentified? --CTho 00:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the pic represent the fish talked about. The dorsal fin should be without marks and on this one we can see black spots ... 84.12.232.141 (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC) StrolgenReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Macrotocinclus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply