Talk:Macrotocinclus

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macrotocinclus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aquarium Fishes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Aquarium Fish articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Aquarium FishesWikipedia:WikiProject Aquarium FishesTemplate:WikiProject Aquarium FishesAquarium Fishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Identity edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Surely this fish is actually Otocinclus macrospilus?

Otocinclus macrospilus http://www.planetcatfish.com/scripts/clog_link.php?q=otocinclus+macrospilus

Otocinclus affinis looks very different. See http://www.planetcatfish.com/scripts/clog_link.php?q=otocinclus+affinis

The fish on the photo is definitely not O. affinis, but pretty much all smaller oto species are sold as "Otocinclus affinis". 213.114.237.26 (talk) 01:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Quatermass 13:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

So all of the results at http://images.google.com/images?q=otocinclus%20affinis are misidentified? --CTho 00:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the pic represent the fish talked about. The dorsal fin should be without marks and on this one we can see black spots ... 84.12.232.141 (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC) StrolgenReply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Macrotocinclus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205144416/http://www.ecology.su.se/pdfs/axenrot/fish.pdf to http://www.ecology.su.se/pdfs/axenrot/fish.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic