Talk:MD6

"Tens and thousands"

Did a copy-edit of subject/verb number agreement and use of commas for introductory clauses. However, the intention of this sentence is not clear enough to correct: "The design of Merkle tree is based on the claims from Intel describing the future of hardware processors with tens and thousands of cores...". The usual idiom is "tens of thousands", meaning 20,000+ or 30,000+ or 40,000+ ... etc. As presently written, "tens and thousands" seems to skip over "hundreds". Are we describing a range from, say, 20 to 5,000 (tens to thousands)? If the range is indeed in the five-figure area (27,000 to 69,000, etc.), then the correct usage is "tens of thousands". Whoever wrote that phrase should be able to correct it using this information. Unimaginative Username (talk) 06:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

"Conventional uni-core"

The sentence "... Intel describing the future of hardware processors with tens and thousands of cores instead of the conventional uni-core systems" disregard the current prevalence of multi-core systems. Seems dated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.1.79.6 (talk) 09:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MD6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20121208172441/http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/addendumC/ to http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/addendumC/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)