Talk:Lucas Bros. Moving Co./GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 23W in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bentvfan54321 (talk · contribs) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm tired of focusing on Deflategate, "Y'all know why I'm here", the best corner in the game, and lame commercials. I'll review this to kill some time. Thanks again for taking on Beat the Chefs. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • The Original Channel parameter says "Fox (2013–2014)". I believe MoS says this should be (2013–14).
  • The second episodes summary states, "Upon raising $150.00..." I don't think the ".00" is necessary.
  • Can the third episode summary be expanded beyond just one sentence?
  • The Rotten Tomatoes link is dead. Can that be replaced?
  • My main concern is the lack of information in the second season's episode list. It appears the list is not fully up to date. A summary of those episodes as well is probably necessary before this becomes a GA.

With these concerns, I'll put this on hold for now. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for taking this, Bentvfan54321. With the episode summaries for season one, I ended up copy editing the entirety of them as they contained a lot of errors. With regards to the second season, I'm not sure I'd consider it a "main aspect" of the article; even without the summaries we still have the premise of the show in the first section. It might take me a while to watch the episodes and write the summaries out, but if it's absolutely necessary I suppose I can. Everything else I think I've corrected. 23W 04:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply