Talk:Lucas Bros. Moving Co./GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 23W in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bentvfan54321 (talk · contribs) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm tired of focusing on Deflategate, "Y'all know why I'm here", the best corner in the game, and lame commercials. I'll review this to kill some time. Thanks again for taking on Beat the Chefs. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The Original Channel parameter says "Fox (2013–2014)". I believe MoS says this should be (2013–14).
- The second episodes summary states, "Upon raising $150.00..." I don't think the ".00" is necessary.
- Can the third episode summary be expanded beyond just one sentence?
- The Rotten Tomatoes link is dead. Can that be replaced?
- My main concern is the lack of information in the second season's episode list. It appears the list is not fully up to date. A summary of those episodes as well is probably necessary before this becomes a GA.
With these concerns, I'll put this on hold for now. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this, Bentvfan54321. With the episode summaries for season one, I ended up copy editing the entirety of them as they contained a lot of errors. With regards to the second season, I'm not sure I'd consider it a "main aspect" of the article; even without the summaries we still have the premise of the show in the first section. It might take me a while to watch the episodes and write the summaries out, but if it's absolutely necessary I suppose I can. Everything else I think I've corrected. 23W 04:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Knowing that you are a capable editor, I'll give it a pass assuming you will come back eventually to finish this up. Also, no sweat if you are busy, but I currently have an article, 2006 UAW-Ford 500, that desperately needs a through review. If you can look at that for me, I'll go ahead and review Dan Deacon: U.S.A. or another one of your nominations as well. Thanks for the quick response! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Bentvfan54321: No problem. Thanks for reviewing! I'll see if I can look the article next week, maybe. 23W 04:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Knowing that you are a capable editor, I'll give it a pass assuming you will come back eventually to finish this up. Also, no sweat if you are busy, but I currently have an article, 2006 UAW-Ford 500, that desperately needs a through review. If you can look at that for me, I'll go ahead and review Dan Deacon: U.S.A. or another one of your nominations as well. Thanks for the quick response! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)