Talk:Louis XVIII/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

I've done a quick initial read through and the article appears to be at or about GA-standard, as it is well referenced and illustrated; that said, the [[WP:Lead] needs cleaning up as it is currently confusing.

I will now do a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the Lead until last. That this point I will mostly be concentrating on "problems". So if a section is not mentioned, its probably OK; but I will provide an overall summary at the end. Pyrotec (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Early life -
  • At his brother's court & Exile -

overalll summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well referenced article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Well referenced
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well illustrated
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations on the qaulity of the article. I'm award it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply