Talk:London Philharmonic Orchestra/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tim riley in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments edit
This article is excellent, I think that the peer review back in September ironed out any wrinkles. Prose is solid, scope is well balanced, content is presented neutrally, referencing is excellent, images have suitable licensing. My only problem with this article is that the programme of the first LPO concert is an artistic rendering, not an actual photo. I have no problem with this, but I think the caption should specify that it is a reproduction.--¿3family6 contribs 00:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)