Talk:Logo/Archives/2018
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 213.55.111.6 in topic “completely abstract”, “brandmark”, “ideograph”
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Logo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
“completely abstract”, “brandmark”, “ideograph”
- This article: Ideographs, such as Chase Bank, are completely abstract forms
- Another article: The Chase logo is a stylized representation of the primitive water pipes laid by the Manhattan Company
This is conflicting, isn't it? A completely abstract logo is e.g. the one for the Norwegian University of Science and Technology by Bruno Oldani. He has stated that the logo “contains no major symbolism” (in Norwegian).
Also, the term brandmark redirects here, but isn't mentioned. Should it be?
Finally, should the term ideograph, which is used, be defined or have a link elsewhere?
Bjornte (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, the whole article could do with a cohesive rewrite, if you make a start I shall try and help Unibond (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
ENDALKACHEW DEMELASH IMPORT & EXPORT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.111.6 (talk) 09:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Cancelled for the time being.