Talk:Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner

Latest comment: 1 year ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

subsequent developments edit

Great to have this article here, at all. Needs work of course, as every young article does. Subsequent developments does not describe what the paragraph contains. Plus it is too heavy on the platitudes. ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC))Reply

Property rights have always been in tension with human rights. Remember slavery? Every law reapportions rights. ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC))Reply

Opinion of the court edit

What did the court decide?? ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC))Reply

Thoughts for Organization edit

I've been spending some time trying to find a way to rework this article. My conclusion is to increase the number of subheadings. I plan to keep the original work and elaborate more on the topic. My plan to break it up is to add Rise of Malls, Public or Private Property, Background, Decision, and Significance. I look forward to any suggestions. Avannes2 (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Austin R. Van NestReply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment edit

  This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Massachusetts, Amherst supported by WikiProject Politics and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply