Talk:Little Things (One Direction song)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 11:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Info box

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Put the music video link as an External link in its own section at the bottom of the article

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • "released in November 2012" → Say it was released on 11 November 2012 in its own sentence at the end of the para

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "with the quintet" → A lot of people won't know what this is, best to just say the band or One Direction

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • shipments, not sales. See here.

  Not done; When comes to digital sales of singles, a certification denotes a number of sales. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, some countries are sales, some are shipments. Hence why I attached the link for you.  — AARONTALK
  • "The vocal ensemble" → One Direction. Ensemble is more for clothing.

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Critical response
Live performances
Weekly charts
  • The Chart column needs the shading, like the Certification table

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • 2012 peaks and 2013 peaks should be in separate tables.

  Done; all peaks where in 2012.. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Certifications

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

References
  • FN2: Captial FM should not be in italics

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN4: MTV News should not be in italics and the publisher is Viacom

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN11: Has no publisher
  • FN12: About.com should not be in italics

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN13: Same as FN4 above and should not be linked as this is the second mention
  • FN14: Has no publisher
  • FN16: BBC should not be in italics

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN17: Has no publisher
  • FN18: Has no publisher
  • FN19: Has no publisher
  • FN20: Has no publisher
  • FN21: Allmusic should not be in italics

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN45: Has no work parameter

  Not done because it is a generic template. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN46: Allmusic should not be in italics

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN48: Same as FN4. Why is the country suddenly being used?

  Done removed country as well; copy paste from 1D disco, where countries are always added. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN51: Same as FN48

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN52: Has no publisher
  • FN54: Has no title, Idolator should not be in italics, and the publisher is missing

Partly   Done; italics — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • FN56: Has no publisher and should not be linked as it already is in FN52

Partly   Done; delinked

  • FN58: Has no publisher
  • FN59: Has no publisher
  • FN60: same as FN2

  DoneRobin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Publishers are needed to meet FA not GA; so I'm not adding them. — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, you can get away without having a work parameter if it is unknown, but not for publishers. All references, regardless of what it is for, need a publisher.  — AARONTALK 22:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Status

On hold for 7 days. Please pay attention to your reference formatting in the future.  — AARONTALK 17:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing, Aaron! — Robin (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
OMFG!!!!!! I thought I had already saved the adjustments to the article before responding to your posts; I closed the tab without saving all the adjustments, thinking it was an old version of article I had left open. I'll be back 2morrow............ — Robin (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've done everything you want, I guess. — Robin (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

You haven't changed sales to shipments. All US certifications are according to shipments only.  — AARONTALK 16:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
But the way I have written it now doesn't indicate that the RIAA denotes its sales or shipments. — Robin (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
But that's not the point. It's incorrect.  — AARONTALK 16:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Done — Robin (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Actually Australia is also shipments. New Zealand is okay though, they base certifications on sales. This is a handy page to know.  — AARONTALK 16:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Did the Aussie cert as well. — Robin (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Passing.  — AARONTALK 16:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.