Talk:List of school bus manufacturers

How to Organize Content? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago8 comments3 people in discussion

I have 2 questions that I am posing here:

1. As far as the lead-in content goes, how much should there be? I'm thinking of cutting back on some of it (mainly the part about short buses), as things are explained at length already.

2. As far as defunct bus manufacturers, I think it probably is time to further break down that list into recent manufacturers and historical manufacturers (i.e., ones in the distant past). As it is now, the list is just starting to get a bit unwieldy (that's why I gave this content its own space off the main school bus page).

Suggestions?

SteveCof00 (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to separate the "recently defunct" (past 20 years) manufacturers from the "long ago defunct" manufacturers (more than 20 years ago).

In regards to the lead of the article, I think it certainly does a good job of explaining things, but we do want to be cautious about not duplicating that which can already be found in the main school bus article. List-type articles should generally be just that -- lists of things. If this article becomes more than just a list, we might want to think about changing the name to "North American school bus manufacturers" or "School bus manufacturing in North America." And since Mexico is part of North America, it would be important to include any Mexican school bus manufacturers (I honestly have no idea if there are any; it seems like Mexico usually ends up with second-hand United States-built school buses most of the time, at least based on the photos I've seen). –BMRR (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Keeping it as a list edit

As I intend to keep this as a list, I decided to condense the lead-in content a bit more than it was before, mainly because the tables in the lists contain that information and I didn't want to create questions for those unfamiliar. It still needs work, but the list of defunct manufacturers is now split before and after 1980. SteveCof00 (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think I've got the page off to a good start now; the tables are split apart now and I've cut back on some of the lead in text that is duplicated in the article (the configurations part should stay as it has a great deal of relevance, but I will work making that part smaller. The individual tables are now collapsible (I can't believe I didn't think of that before!), so scrolling shouldn't be as much of an issue.

Of course, now that the format is (mostly) done, the hard part comes when having to work with the actual content of the article. SteveCof00 (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just wondering: is there a particular reason why the Current Manufacturers are not in alphabetical order? Thanks, BMRR (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is likely probably an incorrect format as it stands now, but I distinguished the full-line bus manufacturers from those who specialize exclusively in Type A buses. That's why it is organized alphabetically twice. -SteveCof00 (talk) 04:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, that makes sense. I guess what threw me off is that the defunct/historic manufacturers seem to be listed in alphabetical order. I don't really have any objection to listing them in "full-line first, then Type A-only" order, but for consistency we should probably do that for the defunct/historic manufacturers as well. Or just list all of them alphabetically. Should we consult the great and all-knowing manual of style? ;-) Perhaps another possible change/upgrade might be to add a "products" column to the defunct/historic manufacturers, so that they match the current manufacturers. –BMRR (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Heyyy if you are a bus driver and you don't mind taking a class of 50 people on a field trip pls pls contact Fesler Junior High and ask for the Leadership class and also ask for Mr. Voss and Ms. Scheafer to find out more and figure out on what to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.189.101.209 (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of school bus manufacturers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140106053440/http://www.ucmo.edu/safetycenter/ncstonline/Documents/2005%20NSTSP-v4-4-7-08.pdf to http://www.ucmo.edu/safetycenter/ncstonline/Documents/2005%20NSTSP-v4-4-7-08.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of school bus manufacturers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic