Talk:List of extinct baronetcies

Additions

Please add Downing Baronets. Kittybrewster ☎ 11:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 Done Rodhullandemu 14:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Please add Beaumont Baronets and Duke Baronets and Parry of Highnam Court Baronets (1902-1918) and Spring Baronets. Kittybrewster ☎ 11:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of extinct baronetcies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150306051137/http://www.baronetage.org/official-roll-of-the-baronets/ to http://www.baronetage.org/official-roll-of-the-baronets/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Link to Leigh Raiment webpage

Links to https://leighrayment.com/ no longer work (owner is deceased).

It might however be available in the Internet Archive WaybackMachine pages. PeterClarke 10:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Table

As someone has previously suggested, this would be better as a table: this would enable us to reduce much of the current duplicate wording and it would look less cluttered.---Ehrenkater (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)