Talk:List of equations in classical mechanics
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | Text and/or other creative content from Talk:Linear-rotational analogs was copied or moved into List of equations in classical mechanics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | The contents of the Talk:Linear-rotational analogs page were merged into List of equations in classical mechanics on July 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Untitled edit
I think a list of equations and formulae is a great idea, especially for the casual student looking for a simple formula while doing homework, studying, etc. Should this idea be expanded to include electrodynamics, maybe statistical mechanics, or other fields of physics in order to have a quick, centralized location for them? If so, where should the new equations go? GLeuty 15:20, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
There's probably something on wikibooks for that.
Why are we using "s" for position vector? edit
Isnt it customary to use "r" for the position vector?
Right. GLeuty 22:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
context edit
These formulas mean very little with the lack of context provided. A lot has to be inferred which is not explicitly stated. At least every formula should point to an article in which it is used or provide a small explanantion here. --MarSch 12:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
u for initial velocity, v for final velocity edit
isn't it easier to use u for initial velocity rather than v0. For example, when dealing with momentum problems for an object A, I would call the mass of A mA, the initial velocity of A uA and the final velocity of A vA. Just seems to be a lot clearer than using v0 A to me.
Merge with Linear-rotational analogs edit
If this article is refactored into a table format simalar to Linear-rotational analogs, that article will be redundant becuase this article has more explainations of formulae and notation. I plan to do that soon. z = z² + c 11:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done (thought I would just do it - not sure if anyone would be so desperate to keep lousy Linear-rotational analogs...). z = z² + c 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)