Talk:List of anthologies of Greek epigrams

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Caeciliusinhorto in topic Inclusions

citations edit

The list is a mess regarding citations. Putting 4 references at the top of the list and a bunch of unreferenced entries is useless. The Dissident Aggressor 20:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of anthologies of Greek epigrams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inclusions edit

Currently the lead defines anthologies as "collections of epigrams and short poems". It seems to me that this definition is missing a crucial part: that the collection be compiled of works by different authors. A collection of epigrams by a single author is not to my mind an anthology. Francesca Maltomini's survey of epigram anthologies in the Blackwell Companion to Ancient Epigram agrees with this definition, and notes that other scholars (she names Cameron and Argentieri) use more restrictive definitions still.

Under this definition, the collection of Posidippus' epigrams is not an anthology, and arguably (insofar as they were collected by people who believed them to be authentically by Anacreon) nor are the Anacreontea.

Similarly on thin ice are the peri epigrammaton by Neoptolemus and the peri ton kata poleis epigrammaton by Polemon: in 1853 Charles Anthon said these were collections of epigrams, but Maltomini says "a title beginning with περί would suit a work on epigrams rather than a proper collection" [emphasis original]. Is the scholarly consensus still that these were anthologies of epigrams? Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply