Talk:List of amusement park rankings

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Saadzmirza in topic Pretty low quality article

Refocus article

edit

I propose to refocus this article much like List of roller coaster rankings so that it could include information wider than just attendance. The new title would be List of amusement park rankings and it would feature:

  • the amusement park rankings section from the other article
  • park-related Golden Ticket Awards such as Best Park, Best Water Park etc

Thoughts? Themeparkgc  Talk  02:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I support this idea.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Partly done I have moved the content from the other article here and moved this article. I will add some Golden Ticket Awards later. Themeparkgc  Talk  23:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Do you think we should remove the 2008 column to keep it just the recent three years? It'll just keep getting longer but I could see keeping them if it helps the article..--Astros4477 (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's probably a good idea. Before you do that though, could we merge some of the statistics into the main articles about the parks? E.g. for Magic Kingdom you would have something like:
2008 2009 2010 2011 Worldwide rank
17,063,000 17,233,000 16,972,000 17,142,000 1
Alternatively, you could have it on company pages. E.g. for Walt Disney Parks & Resorts:
Park 2008 2009 2010 2011 Worldwide rank
Magic Kingdom 17,063,000 17,233,000 16,972,000 17,142,000 1
Disneyland 14,721,000 15,900,000 15,980,000 16,140,000 2
Tokyo Disneyland 14,293,000 13,646,000 14,452,000 13,996,000 3
Tokyo DisneySea 12,498,000 12,004,000 12,663,000 11,930,000 4
Disneyland Park (Paris) 12,688,000 12,740,000 10,500,000 10,990,000 5
Epcot 10,935,000 10,990,000 10,825,000 10,825,000 6
Disney's Animal Kingdom 9,540,000 9,590,000 9,686,000 9,783,000 7
Disney's Hollywood Studios 9,608,000 9,700,000 9,603,000 9,699,000 8
etc
Walt Disney Parks & Resorts 118,000,000 119,100,000 120,600,000 121,400,000 1
Thoughts? Themeparkgc  Talk  01:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ya that's a good idea. I've been wanting to add something similar to that to the Cedar Point article for some time but I've never gotten around to it.--Astros4477 (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think we should only have the top 10 parks for each table to keep it consistent. What do you think?--Astros4477 (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to start adding the attendance charts to the articles. This may take a while and I'm going to do it in groups. It's a busy week with Thanksgiving and stuff so I'll try to get as much done when I can.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lacking 2007 data

edit

Here is the 2007 data : http://www.teaconnect.org/sites/default/files/misc/files/2007erareport.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loup Solitaire 81 (talkcontribs) 13:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of amusement park rankings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Water Parks

edit

Why are the Bahamas listed as being part of Latin America instead of North America? And why is the Middle East lumped together with Europe instead of Asia? 2601:346:C201:60C0:2C79:74D8:6C5A:AEF4 (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Table rankings

edit

The table rankings for the list of parks with most coasters appears to have been vandalised to a ridiculous degree. It's making my eyes hurt, so can someone with better table editing knowledge than me please fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AidenTEM (talkcontribs) 22:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2020 Updates

edit

Universal Studios Hollywood should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the North America table, Hersheypark, Kings Island, and SeaWorld Orlando all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Walt Disney Studios Paris should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Europe table, Tivoli Gardens has a higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nagashima Spa Land, Ocean Park Hong Kong, Hong Kong Disneyland, and Lotte World should no longer appear in the Top 25 Worldwide; on the Asia table, Fantawild Adventure Zhengzhou, Happy Valley Shenzen, Happy Valley Shanghai, and Happy Valley Chengdu all have higher attendance figures 2601:346:C201:60C0:E092:461F:9C22:ED7B (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

2021 updates?

edit

It's now 2022 -- why is there still no data representing 2020? Even if it was a slow year, the info still exists somewhere. How do you flag an article for more attention? 2601:346:C201:60C0:B46C:7F6B:4679:41A9 (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pretty low quality article

edit

Pretty low quality article Saad Mirza (talk) 09:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply