Talk:List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Sindhi Boli Qomi Boli was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 March 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
BLP edit
Information on Dananeer Mobeen must adhere to WP:BLP. I restored the photo because it certainly does help in understanding the article, but without unsourced birth date.
As far as the section on M.Zaid, that could potentially be restored with more sources; before it had only one. MB 16:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
for 1st i would add source so then i can add brithday and for 2nd for i should add more sources Notaeditor101 (talk) 10:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Added M.Zaid with Reliable source Notaeditor101 (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
btw thank you so much for the help ( i would put a smiley emoji in the end but it's to red an it will look like that i am angry) Notaeditor101 (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
BirthDate reference for Pawri ho rahi ha edit
https://www.wikibiodata.com/dananeer-mobeen/ Notaeditor101 (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the birthdate again. See WP:RS. User-generated content is not acceptable (including IMDB) - that would be like using Wikipedia as a source. MB 14:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok Not going to add imdb “Dananeer Mobeen„ is not Famous Birthday but can't add because of Wikipedia some sort of link ban you can search Dananeer Mobeen on Famous Birthday or on Google Notaeditor101 (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Removal of content edit
I've removed the picture of the girl from the section Pawri Ho Rahi Hai because it seems unnecessary to be there and a possible copyrights violation. The section is not about Dananeer but that specific internet phenomena. Secondly I removed the other section which I think is not notable at all and moreover is totally unsourced. The editor reinstating it seems to be self promoting and is a newbie as well so I suppose he is not aware of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I'm going to restore the previous version before these new additions as status quo till further discussion and request not to change it before addressing these concerns. Thanks! USaamo (t@lk) 14:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)