Talk:List of Big Brother (American TV series) houseguests/Archive 1

File:Mnoonan.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Mnoonan.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Frankie James Grande.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Family2016.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Table sorting

The table sorting doesn't work (I suspect because of the "split" rows, e.g. the "Alison Irwin" row). DH85868993 (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

While the new table (based on this one) isn't perfect, it at least eliminates the problem with the split rows. Should complete the table tomorrow! --Another Believer _(Talk) 04:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Excessive Duplicate Links

Do we really need to have more than 10 links that point to the same article (Case-In-Point: a particular season of Big Brother)? It is unnecessary to have that many duplicate links, so I have cleaned up the article to remove those excess duplicate links. Also, I have included thin black lines to keep each season separate.--OfficerAPC (talk) 01:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

But now the table is not sortable, which is problematic. I suggest a revert. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

The table can still be sortable, viewers would need to ignore the thin black lines that were used to make the table more organized.--OfficerAPC (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I think sortable is better and I don't think the dark black lines are necessary. Yes, they look fine for a static table, but not for a sortable one. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)