Talk:Liquid funk
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Fewer bar-oriented samples? edit
No, that's not a criteria for liquid. Even the hardest Drum & Bass doesn't rely on samples and contains synth-lines. Liquid for me is an overall mainstream-compatible, pop-like track with female vocals, a light synth melody, piano samples and drumloops with a "soft" snare drum (as opposed to harder Drum & Bass) and emphasis on the hihats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.62 (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Lists edit
I've cleaned up the lists in this article by removing all redlinks, and some of the articles blue-linked were unrelated. Embedded lists should really be avoided.
- The list of artists still has a lot of... interesting links that are completely unrelated.Evil oatmeal (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah people keep adding red-links back to the lists, not sure whether its worth having "red-linked" artists on the list. What are people's thoughts on this?Jayflux (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
This whole genre could be a stub. edit
Unless people really define its stylistic origin and stop putting everything thats just not in another sub genre into Liquid. It's starting to get bloated and redundant from general Drum & Bass. Alot of artists share roughly the same sentiment.Zoele (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Liquid funk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080809231613/http://www.itstooloud.com/ to http://www.itstooloud.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207013827/http://liquiddnb.com/ to http://www.liquiddnb.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091122060417/http://liquidfunk.ca/ to http://liquidfunk.ca/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)