Talk:Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis
Latest comment: 12 days ago by Pcg111 in topic Merging this article with Linguistic monogenesis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
BOO to Polygenesis
editPolygenesis is bogus. Genetic evidence proves it.
173.57.39.131 (talk) 22:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Anonymous
- For the zillionth time: Genes aren't languages. Genetic evidence is completely irrelevant for historical linguistics. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Merging this article with Linguistic monogenesis
editI propose merging this article with Linguistic monogenesis into Draft:Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis. The reasons are provided at User:Pcg111/Reasons for merging linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis. Thank you, Pcg111 (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
