Talk:Linda Syddick Napaltjarri/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mephiston999 in topic Comments

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mephiston999 (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments edit

Lead edit

  • The lead does not summarize the entire article adequately. Please expand it and make sure that all the main aspects of the article are present in the lead.
  • Can an appropriate infobox be found, I'm sure you can find an infobox for an artist.

Life edit

  •   Done Decrease size of image.

Art edit

Background edit

  •   Done Link acrylic paints
  •   Done men of central Australia to women painting ..... men of central Australia towards women painting
  •   Done and in the 1990s large numbers of them ..... and in the 1990s a large number of them

Career edit

  •   Done when works by her were hung in a private gallery ... when her works were hung in a private gallery.
  •   Done Disambiguation of Dreaming.

Miscellaneous edit

  • It would be great to add a picture of her or of one of her works.
  •   Done Persondata must be added, see WP:PDATA for more info.
  • Be consistent with dates format in the reference section.


Overall a good article, just a few issues to address and I shall pass it. Mephiston999 (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply