Talk:Left Alive/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 02:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Immediately failing this GAN due to a multitude of issues present. These are my thoughts:

1. Messy writing in many places, such as a repetition of words (the development section is chock full of these), sentences that aren't tied to other paragraphs, and paragraphs that provide very little information to the reader in a clear way (ex. "Players spend most of their time trying to evade enemies and create improvised weapons when stealth fails or is not an option.")
2. Why is there a screenshot that shows the glitches? Why does that need to have a visual representation? Having a screenshot depicting the actual gameplay is what should be here.
3. Inappropriate word choices in areas, such as "badly done game physics" and "His personality began as conceited, like one who had an affluent childhood, but as his dialogue made him a more “honest and earnest”, his design changed again."
4. The reception is way, way too short. There's two paragraphs, one of which isn't even talking about the game itself. What's present here is not good either, like: "They also noted “laughable” enemy physics, where killed enemies bodies would jump in the air however they died."
5. Lots of sentences lack commas, proper grammar, or basic punctuation.
6. References are inconsistent with dates, with some using "Year Month Day" and others using "Day Month Year"

There's simply way too many issues present here for it to be a GA. It needs a lot of work before it can be nominated, and will possibly need a total rewrite/major copyedit. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 02:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)