Talk:Leanna Cavanagh/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by DarkGlow in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments

edit
@DarkGlow: After "[her] remark" and for "floods of hate" in #Reception. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done now! That's the section I wrote prior to learning of WP:QUOTE LOL. – DarkGlow20:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·