Talk:Le Règne Animal/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Gug01 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 14:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Obvious large mistakes

edit

There are no obvious large mistakes. In addition, this article lacks {{POW}}, {{unreferenced}}, {{citation needed}} or tags of similar sort.

Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, grammar and prose

edit

The punctuation, capitalization, spelling and grammar is correct. This article talks about the book in good prose.

Lead section

edit

The lead section accurately condenses the article and gives a good, proper introduction communicated through prose.

Referencing and plagiarism

edit

The referencing is correct. There are all reliable sources. The article does not copy text without attributing its source. It doesn't plagiarize at all in any way.

Comprehensiveness

edit

This article is broad and discusses every important part in the book. It is very comprehensive. It occasionally goes into detail, but only because that is necessary.

Point of view

edit

This article is written from a neutral point of view.

Stability

edit

This article is stable, so stable that there is not a single undo in its history.

Overview

edit

This article is great to be a good article. I have a suggestion that is not part of the Good article criteria, but is still valid. Only five users has contributed to this article, and User:Chiswick Chap has made the overwhelming majority of edits. It would be nice if other editors would make lots of edits and help a lot. However, this article is still good article material. This article is perfect to be a good article.

Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
You welcome! I only did what was right. This article should have been a good article after the first review! Gug01 (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01Reply