Talk:Lanthanum/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


I'll take a look at this: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Usually found in combination with cerium.. - any extra meaning gained by saying it like this and not, "Usually with cerium..." ?
Yeah, this was confused and confusedly combined with the second sentence. Changed to "Lanthanum usually occurs together with cerium and the other rare earth elements." Double sharp (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
lanthanum makes up over a quarter of the lanthanide content. - huh? Is this right?
Hmm, this is from the monazite article (24%), so it should be "around". Changed. Double sharp (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I screwed up - thought of lanthanide as compound of lanthanum rather than rare earth metal :P Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
complex multistage extraction process - are both the first two words needed?
Well, it would be a little trivial to say it's extracted using an extraction process. I think the point of the sentence is the complexity, which is why pure La wasn't produced for almost a century after its discovery. Shortened it to read "It is extracted from these minerals using a multistep process of such complexity that pure lanthanum metal was not isolated until 1923." Double sharp (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I meant using one word or other instead of removing both, but like alternative. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
OK; removed "multistep", as the latter seems more important to me here. Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
link or explain paramagnetic
Linked. Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
anywhere to link subshells to? or the various electrons...4f etc....
Linked to Electron shell#Subshells. 4f, 5d, and 6s are also explained there, so I'm not sure if we should link them again to the same place. Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
link binary compounds
Linked. Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I'd spell out Sc2O3 and Y2O3 in words with formulae in brackets
  Done Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
link pyrophoric at first instance
Linked. Double sharp (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  


Overall:

Pass or Fail:   Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply