Talk:LUFS

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LKFS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140912174936/http://loudness.hku.nl/Peak_and_LKFS_-_Grimm_ea.pdf to http://loudness.hku.nl/Peak_and_LKFS_-_Grimm_ea.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Closely related topics best discussed together: EBU R 128 and LKFS. This proposal arose from an earlier discussion from Talk:European Broadcasting Union#Merger proposal. Klbrain (talk) 15:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose - LKFS already also covers ITU-R BS.1770 and LUFS. I don't think it makes sense to try and cover all of this in EBU R 128. LKFS is used by R 128 but R 128 has more to it: alignment levels and true-peak metering. I don't think it makes sense to merge EBU R 128 here. As I stated in the previous discussion I think we should just remove the merge banners. ~Kvng (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 10:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

K-weighted

For an acronym that has K-weighted as one of the components, it sure makes sense to define just what K-weighting is. What is it? Why is that left out of this article? ThreeRocks (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)