Talk:Lütf-ü Celil-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 03:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox;
• Section 1; all good
• Section 1.1; all good; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and links in right place
  • para 4; wrought iron is dup-linked
    • Fixed
• Section 2 and 3; all good
• External links and disambiguation checked; no issues found
• 0% confidence, violation unlikely.

Excellent article, well written. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your review! Parsecboy (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)