Talk:Kubeflow
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Top 10 project by number of GitHub stars, forks and contributions? edit
Article assertion being disputed:
> Kubeflow has quickly become one of the top 10 projects on Github with respect to GitHub stars, forks and contributions showing the excitement of the machine learning community about this new technology [7]
> [7]: "Kubeflow". GitHub. Retrieved 2020-01-09.
But is not even in the top 1000 GitHub projects if we only consider the number of stars. Because as of 2020-10-02 it only have 8331 stars (https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/stargazers) and the top 1000 project by stars (allinurl/goaccess according to gitstar-ranking.com) has 10472 stars (https://gitstar-ranking.com/repositories?page=10).
I don't know how they might consider the 3 stats at the same time (stars, forks and contributions) but I think is really unlikely that that sentence is accurate. And I'm sure that is not showing proper references that support that claim.
So I'll be removing that sentence from the article.
This article reads like an ad edit
Especially the testimonials read like an ad. Can we make the article more factual and less opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryout (talk • contribs) 23:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Remove Major Contributor edit
I am Aronchick - co-founder of Kubeflow - but haven't been involved in the Wikipedia page in many years. Can we remove the major contributor flag? Aronchick (talk) 01:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)