Talk:Krell v Henry

Can someone please list the ratio decendi of the case here ??? 58.105.207.228 19:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

An external link I provided to a case brief was expunged without explanation. Was there something wrong with this particular case brief? If there is nothing wrong with an edit then please do not interfere with it. I was an avid contributor to wiki until about two years ago when I finally became fed up with having my edits micromanaged. I thought it might be time to give wiki another shot. And now, on my very first new contribution, I find that nothing has changed. M-Sheffield (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I deleted it: sorry to not explain. But first, it's probably better not to give voice to third party companies providing what is not-that-great-a-service; and second, the best summary should be HERE on Wikipedia. An appropriate external link would be something like the Bailii transcript of the case itself, but I think Bailii hasn't done one yet. Those are good reasons, and I delete every single external link to lawnix, swarb, or whatever else I find for the same reason. As for your self indulgent boo-hooing over getting reverted, I think very few people would care! If you were an avid contributor by the same name two years ago, I never saw anything you did. But if you want to come and create new pages, add something substantive, which is quality driven and accurate, I personally welcome it with open arms. We need all the English lawyers we can get! Wikidea 09:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Krell v Henry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203064942/http://www3.uninsubria.it/uninsubria/allegati/pagine/1438/priv_comp2.pdf to http://www3.uninsubria.it/uninsubria/allegati/pagine/1438/priv_comp2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)