Dissatisfaction, controversy, and self-promotion

edit

Previously stated user dissatisfaction over the 3.0 upgrade was removed by a Kiwibox employee and replaced with a promotional statement. I would like to cite a reference to the user dissatisfaction but no one has reported on it. There is evidence of it on Facebook and LiveJournal as groups have been created for/by disillusioned members - I'm not sure how to cite that though. I think this page needs to be monitored for self-promotion. A number of the sources cited on the page are only Magnitude press releases or based off of press releases. Free2bme46 (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion

edit

I've added a couple of references to reliable sources; there are plenty more available if required. All of the promotional / non-cited info has been removed from the article. Therefore I don't think that this should be a speedy delete.  Chzz  ►  19:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply