Talk:Kitty Kat (song)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by SMasters in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS requirements for a GA.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Article is properly reference and has no WP:OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Article covers all major aspects and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Image is properly tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall: I am confident that this article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I'm happy to pass it. Well done! – SMasters (talk) 16:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: