Talk:Kiribati at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 16:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 22:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Time to review! 48JCLTALK 22:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):   Main aspects covered, and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:   not sure how you’re supposed to be quote unquote not neutral anyways.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Copyvio

edit

Earwig shows 6.5%.

Source spot-check

edit

Reviewed refs 1 to 13 along with some others, seems good.

Final comments

edit

Good luck on the GT! Addressed some minor style issues and other issues. Good work! Passed. 48JCLTALK 00:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.