Talk:Kids these days
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Jonathan Deamer in topic Merge with Generation Gap
 | This article was nominated for merging with Generation gap on 24 September 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2022. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The quote is incorrectly attributed: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehave/ I don't have time to fix it myself right now. MatthewWilcox (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Merge with Generation Gap
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge . Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
This article barely qualifies as a stub. And the colloquial phrase in the title is obscure because the concept is often expressed by synonyms (e.g., "young people nowadays" or the quasi-astrological typing of Gen-X, Gen-Y, etc.).
I don't see how any new content would differ from Generation Gap. Since there was a quick (limited?) vote not to delete, I suggest a merge to preserve what little content there is. Martindo (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- i support a merge so long as 'kids these days' redirects to it. 110.44.18.224 (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge – Minimal content here that wouldn't be suited to the Generation gap article Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.