Talk:Khachatur Abovian/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Eupator in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

I can tell this article was carefully put together. It is certainly acceptable as a Good Article. If you consider trying Feature Articles, please solicit a copyedit beforehand. --maclean 19:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
1.   Well written. I made a few copyedit changes, mostly removing excess words or adding commas. Two sentences stuck out though:

"was transferred to the same post in Yerevan where he also encountered apathy and antagonism.[13]" - unclear what 'post' is referring to, and where did the 'apathy and antagonism' come from?
"which had a strong influence wide layers of Armenian society" - unclear wording

2.   Factually accurate and verifiable - references look good and properly used via inline citations.
3.   Broad in its coverage - covers major aspects of his life and works.
4.   Neutral - yes.
5.   Stable - yes.
6.   Illustrated appropriately - all images are relevant and properly licensed.

Thank you for the prompt review. I addressed the issues you raised within the prose.-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 20:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply