Talk:Kevin Martin (curler)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Before I start reviewing, please cite every paragraph in the career section.
    The lead is a little bit short. Has he set any records? Was he included in a "Curling Hall of Fame"?
    This article has a strong potential to be promoted, and I am happy to see the first GA about a curler, but it needs some work in referencing, so I am putting this on hold before I resume.
    Are the additions made adequate? Thanks! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 04:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
    The prose is very good
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All references should contain the publisher and the accessdate
    References are otherwise reliable
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: Very nice article! --GoPTCN 11:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: