Talk:Kaushiki

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

good formatting

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

+1, would read again

Sisterly harmer (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vaishnav Fanatics

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Lakshmi Tantra is a Fake Book created by Some Sectarian Vaishnav to claim Maa Hemavati's avatars as Lakshmi. Kanishka Sajwan (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Reason I am stating so is -

1. Lakshmi Tantra is written much after the compilation of Markandeya Purana in 3rd century i.e. It is complied in 12th century.

2. Lakshmi Tantra contains some elements which goes against the Mahapuranas( Devi Bhagwatam, Markandeya Purana, Shiva Purana)like Lakshmi saying herself as Mahishasura Mardini and Kaushiki Mahasaraswati.

3. The Mahapuranas Devi Bhagwatam Markandeya Purana and Shiva Purana confirm that the trio of Mahakali Yoganidra Mahalakshmi Mahishasur Mardini and Kaushiki Mahasaraswati are the manifestations of Maa Hemavati Durga Bhawani only. Kanishka Sajwan (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@chronikhiles I challenge you

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

@Chronikhiles I challenge you to debate with me on talks... If you are not a coward Vaishnava you will accept my debate challenge. Kanishka Sajwan (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Grow up. You're clearly not familiar with Wikipedia policy regarding vandalism and POV edits. Go familiarise yourself with it first, learn to be respectful to other editors, and you might actually make at least one contribution that'll stay on this encyclopaedia. Cheers. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 02:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted your edits. Reliably cited content stays on this encyclopaedia, your beliefs on whether they're real or fake are irrelevant. I won't engage in an edit war with you if you delete the content again. But let me warn you, if you can't engage in an objective and respectful manner, rest assured you won't be editing here long. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 02:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

And I have reverted your edits as well. You may not obliterate other points of view. If there are points of view which are missing for which there are reliable secondary sources (not religious texts), then those should be added to the article without removing other points of view which are supported by sources. Skyerise (talk) 01:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic