Talk:Kangchu system/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mattisse in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have done quite a bit of copy editing of the article. My copy editing should be checked for accuracy to make sure I did not change the meaning. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have schemed through the article, but wish to tell you that "Johor" as a state existed even before the formation of Malaya--nevertheless its good that you helped me to see this fallacy from this angle. Give me a little more time, up to a week and I will update you on this. Mr Tan (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Wonderful. Ping me when you are done. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written   b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced   b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable   c (OR): No OR  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major areas   b (focused): Remains focused on topic  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass  

Well done. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 15:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply