Talk:K-60 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Do not use "then" when describing progression of route in route description.

   Removed instance of "then". — PCB 03:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is a more exact establishment date for the road known?

   I believe it is 1932 but I cannot verify this as I do not have a 1931 map. — PCB 03:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the road would be nice, but not required.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a couple concerns to be addressed. Dough4872 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)