Talk:Just Cause 2/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cognissonance in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 18:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gonna take a shower and then start on this. Cognissonance (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • "developed by Swedish developer" — Minimize repetition, remove "Swedish developer".
  • "destroy government property on Panau for Chaos points. These Chaos points" — Minimize repetition, remove second "Chaos".
  • "They worked with" — Clarify: "Avalanche Studios worked with".
  • "generally-positive" — Remove the hymen--I mean, hyphen.

Gameplay edit

Development edit

  • "According to Johansson" — Clarify: "According to Peter Johansson".
  • "The team also refined parachute" — Fix grammar: "The team also refined the parachute".
  • "an island with a variety landscapes" — Fix grammar: "an island with a variety of landscapes".
  • IGN (source 22) is dead. Archive or replace it.
  • PRNewswire (source 23) does not seem to connect.
  • "allows the user to capture gameplay video and export it to the XMB or upload it to YouTube from the game" — "from the game" is unnecessary when gameplay recording is already established.

Marketing and release edit

  • "A sequel to Just Cause was announced" can be simplified with "Just Cause 2 was announced".

Multiplayer mod edit

  • Cinema Blend (source 40) is unreliable. Use the source it's quoting, GameSpy.
  • Would be nice to have source 42 with the website=IGN parameter.

Reception edit

  • "generally-positive" — There it is, again.
  • "the game was widely regarded as a significant improvement of its predecessor" — Fix grammar: "the game was widely regarded as a significant improvement to its predecessor".
  • Add website=VG247 to source 52.
  • "The explosion was praised for its visual effects" — I think what is meant is "The explosions were praised for their visual effects".
  • Source 51 should be updated with this and put website=IGN instead of "Pc.ign.com".
  • "Kevin VanOrd of GameSpot and Ryan Clements of IGN noted a number of gameplay problems" — Keep it short, but establish what the gameplay problems were.
  • "and travelling between locations was so enjoyable that players would rarely use the black marketeer" — If this is what VanOrd said, just prefix the sentence with "and stated that".
  • "The game's difficulty and artificial intelligence were criticized as frustrating, sometimes spawning in front of the player" — What spawns in front of the player?
  • "the standard and presentation of its cutscene was not on a par with the game world" — Fix grammar: "the standard and presentation of its cutscenes were not on par with the game world".

Legacy edit

Overall edit

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: The article has minor, but noticeable problems with references, grammar and prose.
    Pass/Fail:  
    Cognissonance (talk) 21:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Cognissonance: Thanks for the review! I have addressed all the issues. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Pass/Fail:  
    @AdrianGamer: Cognissonance (talk) 11:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply