Talk:Joint application design

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Carlosrarias in topic Missing references

GG, you guys. This article is heavily plagiarised from its cited sources, yay! 203.26.16.66 11:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure merge them :-D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.61.237 (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missing references

edit

The article claims that a quote comes from the Journal of Systems and Software, but there is no reference to the actual paper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosrarias (talkcontribs) 07:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

The article Joint application development seem to be on the same subject. Ghaag 14:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, after reviewing the information, they could easily be merged and have one term cross reference the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SwissSushi (talkcontribs) 21:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Something is missing from the discussion of key contributors...like...any key contributors...where are the folks who actually do the work in these sessions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.31.2 (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is a website mentioned on this page, www.meatspin.com which I am quite sure doesn't belong to this discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.113.80.250 (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joint application design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint application design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply