Talk:John William Finn/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by RightCowLeftCoast in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 00:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Progression

edit
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

edit

Criteria

edit
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • Incorrect use of an adjective here: "...before his 1956 retirement...", should just be "...before his retirement in 1956..."
    • Seems a little strangely worded: "...and received recruit training in San Diego...", consider instead "...and completed recruit training in San Diego..."
    • I know this is a quote but is there a word missing here: "...That damned hero stuff is a bunch crap...", should it be "bunch of crap"? If its an error in the actual quote no need to change just include "sic" in square brackets.
    • Date formats in the references section are inconsistent. For instance in places you use: "Retrieved 1 April 2013", while in others "Retrieved 2009-07-29". Article appears to predominately use the for Month Day, Year (ie. May 8, 1941) so this should probably be used throughout per WP:MOSDATE.
    • Some of the references lack place of publication while others have. Pls include for the fol: Willbanks and Leahy. (I think that's all that needs it - but pls check for others).
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • All major points cited using WP:RS.
    • No issues with OR.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    • Most major points seem to be covered without going into undue detail.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
    • No issues here.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    • No issues here.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:  
    • Images used are in the public domain and seem appropriate for the article.
I have made changes requested, please see this diff. Kindly let me know if there is anything else that needs to be done for elevation/promotion of this article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Gday. Looks good. Just one outstanding point above IRT the refs. Thanks. Anotherclown (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have added the missing accessdates, here is the diff.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Anotherclown for reviewing this article. FYI, I attended his service and funeral, as did Duncan Hunter, Duncan D. Hunter, Nick Popaditch, several Pearl Harbor survivors, as well as dozens of others.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply