Talk:John Brown's Fort/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Gates designed by George Washington?...
I have removed the sentence "These gates were designed by George Washington." from the paragraph describing the building's reconstruction on the Murphy Farm. There is no citation for this and seems very unlikely, considering this building was constructed in 1848.
This obvious falsehood stood out to me. If it was put in by a history teacher attempting to show students that "anyone can edit Wikipedia" - I assure you this isn't helping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.14.63.46 (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Actually the armory site was specifically selected by Washington while he was President. Construction started in 1799 on the original building at the Armory site with it being finished in 1802 (see Harpers Ferry Armory). It is not out of the realm of possibility that the gates that surrounded the original building had been designed by Washington. In any case, the statement was in relation to the guardhouse/enginehouse/"Fort" while it was at Murphy-Chamber Farm (or "Murphy's Farm")outside of Harper's Ferry - according to the Library of Congress the original Armory gates were moved to the Farm when the "Fort" was reconstructed there in 1895 (see Library of Congress information on Armory Yard Gateway). I cannot find a reference to back up the statement that Washington did design the gateway but have restored it within the text in the hopes that the designer of the gates is 1)not lost to history 2)and can be verified as being [whomever]. Shearonink (talk) 07:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
Hey, this seems kinda short for a full article, especially one for as famous a time as the pre-civil-war. I'm labeling it as stub. -thedrtaylor 05:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Brown's Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121111152033/http://www.wickedlocal.com/marlborough/archive/x1009561605/file to http://www.wickedlocal.com/marlborough/archive/x1009561605/file
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214072258/http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinions/letters_to_the_editor/x1510862793/Brodeur-Legal-reality-behind-Browns-Bell to http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinions/letters_to_the_editor/x1510862793/Brodeur-Legal-reality-behind-Browns-Bell
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)