1. The article merely quotes portions of the speech and is not a copyright violation.
2. Dawn's Copyright does not extend to the text of the speech of Pakistan's founding father, which is public record under Pakistani law, which governs Dawn, a newspaper operating out of Pakistan. How could a historical speech be a copyright issue. The speech can be found in public record. I have made th changes and you frankly have no right to delete this.
There is NO copyright violation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YLH (talk • contribs)
- And you frankly, have no right to decide whether an article you created has any right to be in Wikipedia. I've said multiple times to wait for an admin to have a look, and that it would most likely be keopt, but you contiue to act like a spoilt child who can't get his own way. The Kinslayer 12:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Just because I did not know the rule did not give you the right to delete it. It is quite clear to me that some people just can't admit when they are so blatantly wrong.—Preceding unsigned comment added by YLH (talk • contribs)
- Heym, if your too stupid to look up policies about what makes an acceptable article before putting up an article, then I guess there's no helping you. Don;t get aggresive at me just because your article was found lacking. The Kinslayer 13:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Huh...my article was found lacking. How about the fact that you were too stupid in your history and/or commonsense 101 to know that PUBLIC RECORD released by governments is NOT copyright material. What an idiot indeed. The problem with people like you is that you would not get what is being said, even if it jumped out of the screen and bit you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by YLH (talk • contribs)
- If you say so. The Kinslayer 13:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)