Talk:Jim McGovern (American politician)/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    very well written. Excellent flow to the article
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Sources appear in order
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Hits all the key issues without delving into minute ones.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Could use more images, but that's not a reason to fail GA.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Excellent work. ~DC We Can Work It Out 18:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply