Talk:Jessica Mauboy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 13:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

It's hard to find flaws in this article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   no problems here

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   well there seems to be some overlinking in the main article with "lead single" and "Snoop Dogg" wikilinked more than once; there are also terms that SHOULD be wikilinked like "live album", "choir", "Tamworth", "Los Angeles", "New York"

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   no problems here

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   no problems here

   C. No original research:

   no problems here

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   no problems here

   B. Focused:

   no problems here

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   no problems here

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   no problems here

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   no problems here

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   no problems here

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The inconsistency of wikilinking isn't a major problem, so it's a pass