Talk:Jennifer Lopez/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 8

Greatest Hits album

i know it hast been confirmed by lopez or her label, but is this source reliable?

Anywhere But Home (talk) 07:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

she is married Marc Anthony (5 June 2004 - present) 2 children —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smackedfan1 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Jennifer Lopez will release a "Greatest Hits" on April 29th 2009, not in February. She will also release another album at the same time with "Plan B" in Early 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferLopez2009 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

A new song that will appear on the upcoming 'Greatest Hits' album leaked......[1]......the song is called 'Hooked On You'.

Madre's is no more?

I remembered reading a few news articles a while back saying it had closed. Found this article. Wiki page's link to Madre's website says the domain is for sale. 76.116.136.104 (talk) 08:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Whitewash?

There are numerous online accounts of Lopez's disregard for animal welfare and her insistance on wearing fur clothing, including on PETA websites. So, why no mention of this on Wiki? The skins are obtained by barbaric, cruel methods, and are certainly worthy of mention here. Therfore, I have added this: "Ironically, despite having been applauded for advocating human rights, Lopez has made a point of wearing animal furs which - as PETA videos demonstrate - are often removed while the animals are still alive. She has defiantly told PETA "Educate me," despite their videos of animal cruelty being easily available online." Guv2006 (talk) 01:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

It was already in the article. Gimmetrow 13:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry, I missed that. "Lopez told a radio DJ she was open to being educated on the topic." I find that remark absolutely bizarre. Assuming she has heard of the internet, this woman - who is almost forty - should surely be able to educate herself. Okay, so I've lapsed into opinion here, but her reply is ridiculous. Guv2006 (talk) 11:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

That statement isn't sourced. We don't know what she actually said, when she said it, or the context. It's likely to get removed if not sourced soon. Gimmetrow 22:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Does this link to a PETA blog count as a source?

http://blog.peta.org/archives/jennifer_lopez/ Guv2006 (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

A blog cannot be really be considered to be proper source. 83.108.243.186 (talk

Cultural references

I noticed Mrs. Lopez's article has no reference whatsoever to the well known South Park episode Fat butt and pancake head . Shouldn't it be included as a cultural reference? Thanks.--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 16:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

• I'm not sure if that would add any value to the article, unless you have a better way to do that. If you do, please go ahead. Coaster7 (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Television

The TV section is now complete. --Jamie Lee Jean Hewitt (talk) 11:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

"Lola" as an alias

I don't think "Lola" should be listed as an alias in the infobox. [2] says "Lola is just for this song - it's not her ongoing persona". Given this source, listing "Lola" as an alias would seem to me to be participating in viral marketing and not merely documenting it. Gimmetrow 22:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

jennifer falls on AMA 09

is there anything to talk about her recent falling scene in AMA 09? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.100.123.0 (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

David Copperfield - looks like a hoax edit

Earlier today, I reverted this edit [3]; the sourcing appeared odd and the claim lacks encyclopedic significance. The edit had been made by an anon without any significant edit history. The anon restored the content a little while ago with a snarky edit summary that really caught my attention, so I followed up. Among other things I noted that

• the anon's only other edit appears to be a revert to a movie plot summary inaccurately described as a "rewrite"
• there are no Google News hits regarding the supposed White House appearance in the relevant time period
• there are no Google News hits regarding Lopez and Copperfield appearing at the same event in the relevant time period
• a similar claim appears at imdb, generally unreliable for bio details, but without any reference to the White House, suggesting that the claim is something of an embellished urban cyberlegend
• although sourced to People magazine, there appear to be no references to the story on People's website
• although cited to a named article in People, Google turns up absolutely no references to the story as named, which is unusual for a story that one would expect to be blogged about, etc
• the story turns up in several Wikipedia mirrors, indicating it's something that has already been removed from the article by consensus, which the anon is trying to snark back into the article

Did I miss anything? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. Even if it this event happened, it doesn't seem significant. I eventually found a blog [4] with a comment which includes a link to an image supposedly from the magazine, but the image appears to be a modification of the June 25, 2001 issue [5]. It's nice that People provides a PDF archive of past issues. Gimmetrow 08:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)