Proposed merge of Nawabzada Shahabuddin Khan into Jandol State edit

Nothing much to write. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Closed as successful, absent opposition. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
No Sir - it should not be merged in Jandol State - it is about some individual so how can we merge it into some area's page 2407:AA80:116:B642:3CAD:2ED1:A579:2715 (talk) 07:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support merge, for context and short text; we can have people redirected to other pages, and yet keep categories on their redirect page so that they are more easily found and listed. Klbrain (talk) 00:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merger of "Nawabzada Shahabuddin Khan" into "Jandol State" page
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed merger of the "Nawabzada Shahabuddin Khan" page into the "Jandol State" page. While it is true that Shahabuddin Khan was a prominent figure in the history of Jandol State, merging his page into the larger page on the state would not do justice to his individual contributions and significance.
Shahabuddin Khan was a notable political figure and leader in his own right, and his actions and decisions had a significant impact on the history and development of Jandol State. He played a key role in the state's politics and governance, and his legacy deserves to be recognized and preserved separately from that of the state as a whole.
Furthermore, merging the two pages would make it more difficult for readers to access and understand information about Shahabuddin Khan specifically. It would also make it harder to navigate and find information on the state's other notable figures and events.
In short, I believe that merging the "Nawabzada Shahabuddin Khan" page into the "Jandol State" page would be detrimental to the preservation of Shahabuddin Khan's legacy and would make it harder for readers to access and understand information about him. I urge the Wikipedia community to consider this and vote against the proposed merger. 113.203.221.6 (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Closing as stale, noting the consistent opposition and little support (other than mine). Klbrain (talk) 16:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply